![]() Both can be edited note per note in Pianoteq Standard and PRO. When layering instruments together, there are two parameters you may find of particular interest: volume and attack envelope. playing Bass Marimba in the low range, Xylophone in the upper range and mixing both together in the middle range. The Layering feature allows you to mix several instruments, e.g. In the audio examples below, Dynamic Morphing refers to the fact that the percentage of the various instruments is dynamically modified while playing, whereas it is fixed in the Static Morphing examples. The timbre of the morphed instrument you create is the one of an imaginary acoustic instrument whose physical parameters lie somewhere in between those of the instruments from which you started building the morphing. This new technology handles the morphing at the physical modelling level, providing a stunning acoustic authenticity to instruments that never existed. However these are three of the many instruments you can create with the acoustic Morphing introduced in Pianoteq 7 (Standard and PRO). Instruments VibraDrum, CimbaHarp or GlockenTines for sure do not exist. Up to 48 kHz in PIANOTEQ Stage and Standard. PIANOTEQ PRO offers an internal sample rate of up to 192 kHz. Presets built with PIANOTEQ PRO can be loaded in PIANOTEQ Standard without limitation. In PIANOTEQ Stage, preset loading is limited to parameters that are present in the interface. You can purchase additional instrument packs at any time. These instrument packs are fully working whereas remaining instrument packs are available in demo mode for your evaluation. During registration, you can choose two instrument packs with the Stage version, three with the Standard version and four with the PRO version. Note-per-note edit: all other physical parametersĬoncerns new purchases from 2019 onward. Or meditation.Note-per-note edit: volume, detune, attack envelope If that sound were the only piano sound available to me. That sound is an insult to pianos and to pianists. which is just where most of the music happens. Similarly some complain about the top octave, yet I find it not so bothersome (though that may be because I use that octave so very little).Īll of that pales, though, compared to the abomination of the middle four octaves. I find that the low end of PT is the least objectionable. It's also strange that some people dislike the bass registers of PT. Why produce six piano sounds when you cannot even get one to sound like a piano? It made me wonder why they decided to "branch out" and start producing a Steinway, a Grotrian, a Bechstein, a Petrof, a Steingraeber, and a Bluthner. This was markedly better, but still quite poor. ![]() ![]() I knew that this tech was new, so I had hopes for improvement. My first audition of Pianoteq was version 2.5. In the mean time anyone who has pianoteq feel free to post some videos on the new sound and comments ?įor the folks who don’t care for pianoteq, no worries we can all respect each other’s opinions it’s all David B: I feel exactly the same way. modification of the presets orders, also an aesthetic choice."Īpparently the sound is greatly improved but currently undergoing renovations at home so my digital are not set up atm. various small modifications in the presets such as voicing, hammer hardness, hammer noise, volume (normalization), etc., modification of the micing in some presets (only a few ones), as for example on the "NY Steinway D Classical". ![]() general revoicing, both at the 'factory' level (not visible in the UI) and at the preset level (visible in the Spectrum profile NE of some presets in Pianoteq PRO), making the sound of individual notes nicer and fuller from ppp to fff, adjustment of the hammer hardness, to have a better progression and timbre dynamics from ppp to fff, adjustment of the quadratic modes, some were a bit too hot at fff, ![]() adjustment of the longitudinal modes (responsible for the 'buzzing' sound): in the bass and medium range, some were a little bit too pronounced, Here are some details on the work done on the NY Steinway D (quite a similar work was done on all revised pianos): ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |